Why Philanthropy Should Steam Ahead and Support the Creative Economy
Claudia Jacobs — Associate Director, Sillerman Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy, Heller School for
Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University — writes for Huffington Post:
If
we are to actively enrich our communities, arts should not be a
stepchild of science, technology, engineering
or math (STEM). In New England alone, over 53,000 people are employed
in the “creative economy” and that sector, if it were considered in the
North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS), which it is
not, would rank just below the data and information
sector and just ahead of the truck transportation sector, according to
2009 statistics compiled by the New England Foundation for the Arts. The
18,026 New England arts organizations supply the economy with nearly
$3.7 billion — so why does STEM, an acronym
that excludes the arts, seem to be on the tip of everyone's tongue?
Yes, there are major reasons why the U.S. needs to be focused on
producing adults with skills in these areas, but why not include the
arts and go from STEM to STEAM?
No comments:
Post a Comment